Commentary

Jack Fockler on Royce Value Fund (RYVFX)

Text Size
SmallerCurrentLarger

intro-top

To provide you with greater insight about our investment approach, we ask our portfolio managers and managing directors to share their thoughts on small-cap value investing, the economy and the markets.

In this week's Commentary, we're reprinting a Fund Focus on Royce Value Fund (RYVFX) that appears in our current Advisor Review Book. Penned by Jack E. Fockler, Jr., Managing Director of Royce & Associates, LLC and a Vice President of The Royce Funds, along with John Davis, Director of Shareholder Communications, this Focus takes a closer look at Royce Value Fund, managed by Whitney George and Jay Kaplan.

intro-bottom

Jack Fockler with Chuck Royce

The Middle Way

We have talked a great deal over the last several years about the way in which we saw the small-cap market bifurcating in the early '90s, changes which led us to generally diversify more among micro-cap stocks (those with market caps up to $500 million) and to take larger positions in a more limited number of holdings in the upper tier of small-cap (where market caps range from $500 million to $2.5 billion).

In the current decade, we observed another change. While it was a less dramatic event, it was still significant to the way that we invest.

It took place in the upper reaches of the smaller company universe, or rather near the line that separates small-cap stocks from their mid-cap peers. As small-cap stocks matured—that is, as trading volumes grew and spreads between bid and ask shrank—these companies began to look increasingly similar to those mid-cap stocks with market caps between $2.5 billion and $5 billion. This led us to investigate this mid-cap area more thoroughly.

"…Our move into mid-caps comes from a confluence of two factors—our experiences with maturing small-caps and our observation that small- and mid-cap companies were behaving more and more alike. ."

As Small Migrates to Mid

We had made previous forays into mid-cap companies, mostly, as it were, by default. While our practice is to set trigger prices on the up and down side whenever we purchase a stock, we also regularly re-evaluate our portfolio holdings. Over the years, there have been instances in which a small-cap company has migrated into mid-cap territory. When the business fundamentals remain strong and the company's prospects continue to look promising, we typically choose to hold (or occasionally build, if permitted by prospectus) the position.

Thus, our move into mid-caps comes from a confluence of two factors—our experiences with maturing small-caps and our observation that small- and mid-cap companies were behaving more and more alike.

Royce Value Fund Launched in 2001

When we introduced Royce Value Fund in June 2001, we saw it as a variation on the theme that we first struck with Royce Premier Fund in the early '90s. In the latter portfolio, we typically hold 50-60 small-cap stocks. While Royce Value Fund also holds a limited number of companies (by which we mean 100 or fewer), it will usually hold more positions than Premier. Also in contrast to Premier, its holdings are drawn from both the small- and mid-cap segments of the stock market.

The selection criteria for the Fund is vintage Royce. We seek companies with strong balance sheets, high internal rates of return, a history of earnings and the ability to generate free cash flow. The key distinction, then, is the Fund's embrace of the mid-cap asset class.

Fertile Small- and Mid-Cap Ground

In the years just prior to and since the Fund's inception, we have seen what we thought were great opportunities in mid-cap companies. These years have also seen the common ground between small- and mid-cap companies expand to the degree that we tend to think of those stocks with market caps between $500 million and $5 billion as a single group. The businesses in both sectors tend to be established, the stocks more liquid and institutional interest robust. Royce Value Fund gives us the necessary exposure for investment in this fertile small- and mid-cap ground.

We think that the Fund's performance and volatility scores bear this out as shown below. For the periods ended 9/30/07, the Fund consistently outperformed the Russell 2000 Index, along with what we believe are respectable volatility scores for the five-year period ended 9/30/07.

We think that Royce Value Fund is an appropriate choice for a risk-conscious investor seeking exposure to small- and mid-cap companies.

Royce Value Fund vs Russell 2000: Performance* and Volatility** Comparison

  AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
Through September 30, 2007
  VOLATILITY SCORES
For the 5-Year Period
  YTD One-Year Five-Year Since Inception (6/14/01) Annual Operating Expenses Beta Standard Deviation
Royce Value Fund 8.50% 21.77% 28.42% 17.34% 1.42 1.28 14.98
Russell 2000 3.16 12.34 18.75 9.37 n/a 1.24 14.64

*Important Performance Information

All performance information reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Current month-end performance may be obtained by clicking here. Annual operating expenses reflect the Fund's total annual operating expenses for the Investment Class as of the Fund's most current prospectus and include management fees and other expenses.  All performance and risk information presented in this material prior to the date of commencement of Investment Class shares on 3/15/07 reflect Service Class results. Shares of the Fund's Service Class bear an annual distribution expense that is not borne by the Investment Class.

This material is not authorized for distribution unless preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money. The Royce Funds invest primarily in a limited number of small-cap stocks which may involve considerably more risk because a decline in the value of any one of these stocks would cause the fund's overall value to decline to a greater degree than a less concentrated portfolio. The Fund may invest up to 25% of its assets in foreign securities that may involve political, economic, currency and other risks not encountered in U.S. investments (see "Primary Risk for Fund Investors" in the prospectus). The Russell 2000 is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of domestic small-cap stocks. It measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 index.

**Beta and Standard Deviation are measures of a fund's relative risk, and are supplied by Morningstar, Inc. Beta is a measure of sensitivity to market movements compared to the S&P 500 Index, with the beta of the S&P 500 equal to 1.00. A low beta means that a fund's market-related volatility has been low. Standard deviation is a statistical measure within which a fund's total returns have varied over time; the greater the standard deviation, the higher the fund's volatility.

View recent month-end performance and expense details for all of The Royce Funds.

© Royce & Associates, LLC, 1414 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10019, (800) 221-4268. All rights reserved. Distributor of The Royce Fund and Royce Capital Fund: Royce Fund Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Royce & Associates. View our Policies & Procedures, including, among others, our Sarbanes-Oxley Code of Ethics, Privacy Policy and Proxy Voting Guidelines and Procedures.

Full HTML Version