
We believe strongly in the idea that a long-term investment perspective is crucial for determining the success of a particular investment approach. Flourishing in an up market is wonderful. Surviving a bear market by losing less (or not at all) is at least as good. However, the true test of a portfolio’s mettle is performance over full market cycle periods, which include both up and down market periods.
Since the Russell 2000’s inception on 12/31/78, value—as measured by the Russell 2000 Value Index—outperformed growth—as measured by the Russell 2000 Growth Index—in six of the small-cap index’s eight full market cycles. The most recently concluded cycle, which ran from 3/9/00 through 7/13/07, was the longest in the index’s history, and represented what we believe was a return to more historically typical performance in that value provided a significant advantage during its downturn (3/9/00 - 10/9/02) and for the full cycle. In contrast, the new market cycle that began on 7/13/07 has so far favored growth over value, an unsurprising development when one considers how thoroughly value dominated growth in the previous full cycle.

For the full cycle, value provided a sizeable margin over growth, which finished the period with a loss. All Royce Funds then in existence held a performance advantage over the Russell 2000. Interestingly, our most conservatively managed offering, Royce Special Equity Fund (+227.4%) was our best performer, followed by our flagship, Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (+207.1%). However, each Royce Fund provided a significant edge over the Russell 2000 during the full market cycle.
In the new cycle’s somewhat brief peak-to-trough period, growth was ahead of value, though its advantage was slight and neither style index managed to provide positive performance during the downdraft. All but two Royce Funds outperformed the Russell 2000 in this period, with Royce Premier Fund providing the best (albeit negative) performance for the period, followed by Royce Select Fund I.
We would caution against reading too much into a period that lasted only slightly longer than a calendar quarter, but it is still worth noting that growth’s return more than doubled that of the value index. Only four Royce Funds outpaced the Russell 2000 during this period, with Royce Premier and Value Funds offering the most significant outperformance spread.
During this nearly year-long period, both value and growth posted negative returns, though growth lost less by a comfortable margin. Ten of 14 Royce Funds outperformed the Russell 2000, with two laggards trailing by less than a single percentage point. Once again, Royce Premier and Value Funds stood out, as did Royce Select Fund I.
The thoughts concerning recent market movements and future prospects for smaller-company stocks are solely those of Royce & Associates and, of course, there can be no assurance with regard to future market movements. Smaller-company stocks may involve considerably more risk than larger-cap stocks.
![]() |
Important Performance and Expense Information
All performance information in this Review reflects past performance, is presented on a total return basis and reflects the reinvestment of distributions. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate, so that shares may be worth more or less than their original cost when redeemed. Shares redeemed within 180 days of purchase may be subject to a 1% redemption fee for all Funds, except for Royce European Smaller-Companies and Global Value Funds, which may be subject to a 2% redemption fee, payable to the Fund. Effective July1, 2008, shares redeemed within 365 days of purchase (reduced from three years) may be subject to a 2% redemption fee payable to the Fund for Royce Select I, Select II and Global Select Funds. Current performance may be higher or lower than performance quoted. Current month-end performance may be obtained here. All performance and expense information reflects results of the Fund’s oldest share Class (Investment Class or Service Class, as the case may be). Gross operating expenses reflect the Fund’s gross total annual operating expenses, including management fees, and any 12b-1 distribution and service fees. Net operating expenses reflect contractual fee waivers and/or reimbursements. All expense information is reported as of the Fund’s most current prospectus. Royce & Associates has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse operating expenses through December 31, 2008 to the extent necessary to limit total net annual operating expenses to no more than 1.49% for the Service Class of Royce Low-Priced Stock, 100 and Dividend Value Funds and 1.69% for Royce European Smaller-Companies and Global Value Funds. Royce & Associates has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse operating expenses through December 31, 2010 to the extent necessary to limit total net annual operating expenses to no more than 1.69% for the Service Class of Royce European Smaller-Companies and Global Value Funds. Royce & Associates has contractually agreed to waive fees and/or reimburse operating expenses through December 31, 2017 to the extent necessary to limit total net annual operating expenses to no more than 1.99% for the Service Class of Royce Dividend Value, European Smaller-Companies and Global Value Funds.
Shares of a Fund’s Service, Consultant, R and K Classes bear an annual distribution expense that is not borne by, or is higher than, the Fund’s oldest share Class. The Royce Funds invest primarily in securities of micro-, small and/or mid-cap companies, which may involve considerably more risk than investments in securities of larger-cap companies (see “Primary Risks for Fund Investors” in the respective Prospectus). Please read the Prospectus carefully before investing or sending money. The Russell 2000 is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of domestic small-cap stocks that measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest publicly traded U.S. companies in the Russell 3000 index.